Which Side of the Auto DM Fence are You On?

In: Twitter

22 Feb 2009

peeking-fenceI’ll go first and say that I’m still sitting on the fence. I know many of you have your feet firmly planted on the ground on one side of the fence or the other, but I can see both sides of the argument. I am definitely leaning more toward one side than the other, but still on the fence, none the less.

For those of you who are new to Twitter and aren’t familiar with what I’m talking about, auto DMs are direct messages that are sent automatically by a service, like TweetLater or SocialToo, in response to a new follow. Some people use them to say something simple like, “Thanks for the follow” and others go too far (in my opinion), and ask you to follow a friend or worse, check out their website and then provide a link. Although the latter may not technically be spam based on the dictionary definition, it sure comes close. I may have followed you but that hardly qualifies as opting in and giving you permission to advertise to me.

It is possible to cut out most of the auto DM clutter by opting out in a couple places, but it takes a little effort. To opt out of auto DMs sent by SocialToo you need to open an account, provide them with your Twitter ID and password, and then select the opt out box. It’s a bit easier to do on TweetLater and you won’t need to sign up for their service first. The process is fairly simple. First you need to follow @optmeout and then reply to a DM, but opting out of TweetLater DMs will only stop the ones sent using TweetLater. SocialToo claims that by using their service they opt you out of all services but I’m still getting DMs that I’m pretty sure are auto sent even though I’ve opted out on both sites.

I want to be clear that this post is about auto DMs specifically because I have no problem with a personal direct message that is sent when I follow someone. How can you tell the difference? Because a personal DM will say something like, “Hi Hugh, thanks for the follow. I checked out your website and love your backgrounds. Nice blog too.” Who would be upset about a DM like that? It’s obviously personal; couldn’t have been constructed automatically; and it’s complimentary and everyone appreciates compliments.

So back to auto DMs and what I don’t like about them. Sure, some of you think that it’s polite to thank someone for following you, like shaking hands with someone, but if I know it was sent automatically by a service, why would I perceive it as a personal thank you? It’s totally impersonal as a matter of fact. Like watching a politician shake hands with people. It’s a reflex and means nothing.

Here’s my suggestion. If you get a few followers a day and want to take the time to thank them with a DM and actually personalize the message in some way, more power to you. But, if you get a lot of followers or use an auto follow service and also use that service to send auto DMs, please stop. And, if you send me an auto DM with a link to check out, BAM, say hello to my leetle unfollow.

Related posts:

  1. Speeding up the New Follower Approval Process with Tweet Later’s New Semi-Auto Vetting Tool
  2. How to Stop the Auto DM Madness and Give Spammers the Finger

  • Initially did use auto-DM to engage, but, as David pointed out above, came to realize that it's a onesided conversation, and since it is automated, is perceived to have less 'value' than a live DM or tweet.
  • Thanks for your well worded comment, David. I agree, for the most part with what you said and that's why I'm still teetering on the fence.

    I must admit though that after getting so many auto DMs that even the polite and non promotional ones like you are using tend to rub me the wrong way.

    I think it's one of those things where certain people ruin a good thing through misuse and abuse so that eventually it no longer works for anyone, even the folks that use it the right way.
  • When I first came onto Twitter I thought it would be okay to use auto DM's as an opportunity to invite persons to join me on both LinkedIn and Facebook. What harm could it do? After all we could all then connect and together make use of tools in additional channels of social media.

    It was soon pointed out to me, by some people kind enough to offer feedback, that this was a one-sided conversation and a presumptuous request to enhance a non existent relationship.

    I came quickly to see, and agree, that the auto DM loses all respect when used as a way to telemarket one's self, sites or services. In this regard I further find little distinction between requesting to join a network or to visit and view a credible blog or website to a get rich quick scheme -spammer- microsite. The lines here are too easy to cross so better to avoid them altogether.

    With gratitude and understanding I discontinued this practice immediately.

    I do not believe, however, that the use of auto DM's is an overall bad practice. So far, without comment or complaint, I have chosen to continue to make use of one.

    The following is the auto DM I currently use at Socialtoo:

    "Thank you very much for following me. Please forgive this one time automated reply. I look forward to sharing for real."

    I do this for the same reason I have a voicemail message on my cell and at home. It is in order to say that while I am not here right now I am glad that you took the time and energy to reach out to me.

    My intent is that this is as transparent as possible and without the premise of it being anything other than an auto DM; just one meant with utmost respect. I do sincerely hope that we might have opportunity to share personally at the earliest convenience.

    Thanks for posing the question and allowing a venue to respond.
  • Barbara: Since auto DMs are sent after you follow someone, are you saying that you would unfollow people that send you an auto DM when you follow them?
  • I hardly ever follow auto-DMs at all, as the vast majority are, as one had noted, please buy my product. Not enticing at all.
  • I almost agree with you, Mike, and that's why I said I'm still partially on the fence, although I still find the DMs that ask me to check out their blog a bit spammy and the ones that want me to tell them about myself are cheesy and seem like a lead-in to spam me later.
  • I think auto-DMs are ok, but only if used for the right purpose. As you mentioned, I hate seeing "Thanks for following me. Come buy my wares at this link!" What I would rather see is a bit more information about the person I am following, maybe a link to a personal blog other than the website linked in the Twitter profile, or even a question like "Thanks for the follow. How did you find me?" The key is providing some value.

    Also, with services like Twitter DMer cropping up which will allow you to pull in some dynamic content based on the user, you can almost effortlessly personalize that special message. At the same time, when someone realizes you're just hitting them with a form reply, its probably going to do more harm than good. However, I'm not going to move into "No" court just yet. I think there are some ways it can be used purposefully, we just haven't quite figured it out yet.
  • Good writing. Keep up the good work. I just added your RSS feed to my Google News Reader.

    Matt Hanson
  • Great question! I am new to twitter (few weeks new) and I don't "intend" to use automatic DMs. I DO take the time to review those that follow and I do click to their websites...I thought that was the point of social networking? :)

    My only reservation looking into the future, since I am new and just starting I am probably taking more time to review than those that have been doing this awhile and have thousands of followers...so that being said I may feel different in six months? I hope to always use the personal touch, I plan to continue to take the time to send a few personal dms to those that pique my interest!

    Oh and one more thought...to those of you that use them....even though I am a newbie...I can spot them immediately...and they leave me feeling "unsocial"...lol (Im sure for a select few they are a necessary evil...but for most of you, I think personal dm would serve you better and to the select follows that are deserving in your area of interest.)

    K...thats my 2 cents!

    S
  • I say No to auto DM's. I agree with what you have above regarding the personalized DM when someone follows. After all, this is SOCIAL MEDIA correct? Setting up auto messages and tweets isn't really social is it?
  • Hey Hugh, thanks for the post! I read it and... wait... auto comment off.

    I guess I have been lucky in this regard as I have not received any auto DM's. I can say with all certainty that while I appreciate someone's attempts to promote and market themselves, this is not something I would appreciate.

    You said it best. "I may have followed you but that hardly qualifies as opting in and giving you permission to advertise to me."

    Count me as 1 vote against.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Follow Hugh Briss

Subscribe via RSS or Email and follow me on Twitter and Facebook.

      
 



Latest Tweets


Join me on Facebook